Camilla didn't respond to my text, but on February 22, 2026, I received an email from Liliam at UVC:
The email raised more questions for me than it answered.
- It doesn't mention Secrets Mirabel anywhere, but it does reference a "QR E-claim," which I thought might be the complaint I submitted via the QR code Camilla gave me at Secrets Mirabel.
- The third line tells me my "comments have already been addressed." Really? I wonder how they addressed them. They certainly haven't been addressed to my satisfaction.
- It offers me $200 of Leisure Cash "as part of (UVC's) commitment to (my) satisfaction." I wasn't entirely sure what Leisure Cash is, but I was more confused by the implication that this offer was being presented as only part of UVC's commitment to my satisfaction. Why is UVC trying to resolve my complaint in parts? Does this imply that a future offer to compensate me fully for denying me a room upgrade that was valued by the resort at $1,050 was in the works?
I responded the same day to Liliam:
Hello, Liliam, and thank you for your email. Although you don’t mention it specifically, I assume your offer is related to my complaint that on our January 2026 trip to Secrets Mirabel, we were denied a free upgrade to the next higher room category, though the next higher room category was available and offered to us for $150/night.
I need some clarification of your offer:
- What is “leisure cash”? On some of our UVC vacations, we’ve been given resort coupons that can be used in only small amounts to reduce the cost of various on-site purchases (e.g. $20 off a bottle of wine, $10 off a purchase in the gift shop, $25 off a spa treatment, etc). On other vacations, we been given a resort credit which can be used, as a lump sum, to offset any additional expenses (e.g. room upgrade, romantic dinner, bali bed, etc). How does leisure cash work?
- You mention that you’ve referred my complaint to UVC Quality Assurance group and tell me that your leisure cash offer is part of showing UVC’s commitment to my satisfaction. That suggests to me that this leisure cash offer is just a start, and that I can expect a more comprehensive offer from UVC QA in the future that resolves my complaint fully. Is my understanding correct? I wouldn’t accept a $200 leisure cash offer as a full settlement of my complaint.
Please provide me these clarifications.
Thank you.
Liliam wrote back on February 24, 2026.
The jaw dropper is in the third paragraph:
After carefully reviewing the situation with the hotel’s management team, we confirmed that the next room category was not available during your stay.Six weeks after we were offered an upgrade to the next higher room category if we paid $150 more per night, UVC "confirmed" there was never availability in that room category. Wow! I've got to see evidence of that before I'm willing to believe it.
Liliam did answer my leisure cash question, but she revised the bit about that being just part of the resolution. She wants to settle the entire issue for $200. I won't accept a $200 resolution to an issue that the resort valued at $1,050.
Liliam also mentioned this blog. I'm famous! -- well, UVC-famous.
When we returned from our February trip to Secrets Papagayo, we were sent the usual "how was your stay" follow-up email from UVC. It asked about my experience with the resort as well as with UVC. In short, I told them I loved Secrets Papagayo, but I don't love UVC. The survey asked for specifics. I didn't want to spend time reiterating all the UVC complaints that I've been writing about in this blog, many of which have already been relayed to someone at UVC in one forum or another. So, feeling bold and defiant, I sent them a link to my blog to help them understand my comment that I've fallen out of love with UVC. (Ok. Bold, defiant and lazy). That's undoubtedly how Liliam came to hear of the "blog where club-related documents and benefits are shared."
I responded to Liliam's second email on February 25, 2026:
I’d like to see the evidence you viewed that led you to conclude that there was no availability at Secrets Mirabel. Please forward it to me at your earliest convenience. I’m skeptical that it actually exists.
The upgrade was offered to us for $150/night. Oscar, the resort staff who checked us in, even offered to give us a key to the room so we could see it to help us make a decision. We turned it down because we didn’t want to pay the money. I’d also point out that at no point when we were talking to Camilla (a Mirabel UVC rep) about this denied benefit did she ever tell us there was no availability. It seems disingenuous for UVC to claim, six weeks after we were offered the room, that there was no availability. How could the room be offered to us, and how could we be invited to walk through it, if it wasn’t available? Without seeing evidence supporting your conclusion that there was no availability, I’m going to conclude that this is yet another issue where UVC is denying me a contractual benefit.
The value of the upgrade offered was $150/night. Our stay lasted 7 nights. That equates to a benefit of $1,050 USD that UVC has denied me. The only resolutions acceptable to me are a $1,050 refund, seven Premier Nights or a return certificate to Secrets Mirabel. I will not accept $200 in leisure cash for denying me a contractual benefit even the resort valued at $1,050.
I started writing a blog on my experiences with UVC and Hyatt in November 2025 after finding no Hyatt executive willing to engage me on why Hyatt was denying me access to (now) eight AMResorts branded properties that my contract tells me I have a contractual right to book at. The blog also addresses the many other complaints I have about my experiences with Hyatt and UVC. Neither the moderators of the Official UVC Facebook group nor the QA folks assigned to investigate my original complaints (made in an unapproved post in the Official UVC group on July 24, 2025) have even addressed my complaints let alone resolved them.
I doubt someone in your position in the UVC organization can do anything about my complaints. I really want a Hyatt executive, a decisionmaker, to talk to. Employees at your level, even if they sincerely want to resolve my issues, have no authority to do anything about them. If you sincerely want my feedback on my Hyatt/UVC experience, read all about it at https://jteahan.blogspot.com/.
I am aware of the confidentiality clause in the contract. It’s actually the thirteenth clause in my contract:
THIRTEENTH. CONFIDENTIALITY AND PERSONAL INFORMATION.
Member will not disclose the "Confidential Information" (as this term is defined further on herein) to anyone else. This provision will remain in force until after the termination of this Contract. This Contract and its Exhibits will be considered as Confidential Information, as well as any other material which Member obtains or receives from the Mediator in relation to: (1) rates, benefits, discounts and promotions from Suppliers or Mediator; (2) sales, marketing and business methods, list of Member requirements and any other information related to Suppliers or Mediator. Any breach of this condition will result in immediate termination of this Contract.
The clause applies only to my contract and its exhibits. When I reference contract language in my blog, I don’t use my contract. I use another UVC contract (the Tate contract) I found online at: https://www.scribd.com/document/744848104/SA1-003433-CO-10-03-2019
The Tate contract was written at a different resort but in the same year as my Gold+ contract and is similar, but not identical, to mine. It works for my purposes.
I post once a week and currently have another 14 posts drafted. I’d like to see your comments on the posts which I’ll respond to when appropriate.
This blog exists because of the stonewalling I got from Hyatt's UVC in the Official UVC FB group when I asked why Hyatt's UVC was denying me my contractual benefit to book with club benefits at all AMResorts brands. The stonewalling continued with Rosie, the first UVC QA person I talked to and went on with Luis, my 2nd QA rep. Neither would even address my complaints. I encountered more stonewalling from Rodrigo Llaguno, and Javier Águila, the Hyatt execs I found on my own trying to get some resolution to my concerns. Neither Rodrigo or Javier would respond to me. It continues now with Camilla and Liliam who won't give me a contract benefit I'm entitled to and who seem to spend significant time dreaming up excuses for why.
Every one of these GBS/Hyatt/UVC employees (I'm rarely sure who anyone is employed by in the network of suppliers UVC gives me to work with) has been made aware that Hyatt's UVC is breaching my contract, but none of them has done anything about it. This is what UVC has devolved to under Hyatt's management.
Now that UVC has suspended my membership (without any contractual authority to do that and despite contract language that allows me to use club benefits as long as my annual renewal fee is paid up), it seems, the stonewallers have become suppressors. I've already experienced this tactic from the moderators of the Official UVC Facebook group when they refused to publish a couple of my posts in their group.
When members raise legitimate issues about what's going on with a club they've spent tens of thousands of dollars on, an alternative approach (and I think, a better one) is to communicate with them. More communication, not less, is what's needed. That's what honorable companies do.